Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections
Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports | |||
---|---|---|---|
Vandalism [ ] |
User problems [ ] |
Blocks and protections [ ] |
Other [ ] |
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
Archives | |||
121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~
), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}
is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
Block request for User:Dayyousnbashid
Dayyousnbashid (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Vandalism despite multiple warnings Cyberwolf (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Done. The user was not warned, so I warned him/her. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Taivo: I see five instances of "Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing." on User talk:Dayyousnbashid. They are parts of {{Copyvionote}} and {{Speedynote}}. Those aren't good enough for you? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I think the general consensus among administrators is that those routine warnings from bots are not enough to next go to a block. A more specific warning from a human should come first. - Jmabel ! talk 16:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: All of those instances were from real live human beings, one of which was our OP. Yes, they were templated, is that a problem? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- At this point, this particular user is blocked, because their last response suggests strongly that they don't understand thing one about copyright.
- But, yes, I think it is a problem when someone might be well-intentioned, is clueless, and all we give them are templated generic warnings. Many people who can be reached by a more targeted message will blow right past something that looks that generic. - Jmabel ! talk 19:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- This is especially the case when people probably don't read much English; linking them to relevant materials in their own language is important. And, yes, there is an Arabic variant of the warning, but it sends people to COM:Copyright_rules/ar. Have a look at that page and consider exactly how useful it would be to an Arabic-speaker who does not know English. - Jmabel ! talk 19:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: Worse, Commons:Copyright rules/fa doesn't even exist. The user appears to write in Persian (known formerly and internally as Farsi). — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oops. I mistook it for Arabic. I'll fix the message I left. - Jmabel ! talk 22:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: At least that's what Google Translate says; I don't know either. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- You are probably right, and it fits with the name; I just didn't think about it initially. - Jmabel ! talk 22:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: At least that's what Google Translate says; I don't know either. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oops. I mistook it for Arabic. I'll fix the message I left. - Jmabel ! talk 22:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: Worse, Commons:Copyright rules/fa doesn't even exist. The user appears to write in Persian (known formerly and internally as Farsi). — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: All of those instances were from real live human beings, one of which was our OP. Yes, they were templated, is that a problem? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I think the general consensus among administrators is that those routine warnings from bots are not enough to next go to a block. A more specific warning from a human should come first. - Jmabel ! talk 16:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Taivo: I see five instances of "Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing." on User talk:Dayyousnbashid. They are parts of {{Copyvionote}} and {{Speedynote}}. Those aren't good enough for you? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Done. The last message the user wrote on his/her user talkpage was not good. I blocked the user for a week for intimidation. Taivo (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks! — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Block request for User:Akasahe28
Akasahe28 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Continuing to upload a coyvio logo after their last blocked in February 2025. D.18th (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Done. I deleted last 4 uploads due to failed license review and blocked Akasahe for a month (second block). Taivo (talk) 11:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
sock of User:Yukitanooki
- NightShade01 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
sock puppet for block evasion, which has been confirmed at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yukitanooki. 0x0a (talk) 04:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Done. I blocked NightShade indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Protection request for Template:Prompt
Used in the Upload Wizard interface if the editor indicates that the work was AI-generated and fills out the prompt field, so should probably have some sort of protection. 600+ transclusions and likely to continue growing. Sdkb talk 01:28, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Done I protected it at "autopatroller" level. - Jmabel ! talk 05:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
User:Arafatul Islam Akan Robi
Arafatul Islam Akan Robi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) Uploading copyvio after the last warning. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 19:14, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Done Blocked for a week, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 19:22, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
- Bhcdjjdsh (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Master god of the universe (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
Blocked on enWiki. CU has determined that the former is the master and the latter the puppet without need for SPI. Master has uploaded multiple similar corporate logos here, all up for DR as adverts. Please take any necessary action. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 15:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Half done I deleted the first user's uploads and Jeff already left them a warning, but as of yet they've done nothing on this project to deserve an immediate block. The second account has no local edits. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy My glass is nether half full nor half empty. It is precisely the correct size. Good call. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 19:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Camiyabril
- User: Camiyabril (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)
- Reasons for reporting: Continued copyvio uploading like File:KIt body talleres2025t.png after block for doing so.
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am not sure that File:KIt body talleres2025t.png is a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yann: No license since 8 April 2025, deleted by Krd on the 16th, uploaded since your block 09:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC). They have other such uploads like File:Kalmine2025a.png, File:KIt socks smt2025h.png, File:Kt left arm gyej2025h.png, File:Kity socks dyj2025a.png, etc. with what looks like a history of failure to include licenses on some files and failure to heed advice about those files on their user talk page. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- It was deleted for having no license, but there actually was a license. It is the same for all files. And certainly File:KIt socks smt2025h.png and others are too simple too have a copyright. File:KIt body talleres2025t.png is the most complex of all, but still. Yann (talk) 20:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, fine. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- It was deleted for having no license, but there actually was a license. It is the same for all files. And certainly File:KIt socks smt2025h.png and others are too simple too have a copyright. File:KIt body talleres2025t.png is the most complex of all, but still. Yann (talk) 20:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yann: No license since 8 April 2025, deleted by Krd on the 16th, uploaded since your block 09:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC). They have other such uploads like File:Kalmine2025a.png, File:KIt socks smt2025h.png, File:Kt left arm gyej2025h.png, File:Kity socks dyj2025a.png, etc. with what looks like a history of failure to include licenses on some files and failure to heed advice about those files on their user talk page. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 19:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am not sure that File:KIt body talleres2025t.png is a copyright violation. Yann (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2025 (UTC)